Diving During the Eclipse: a Unique Fieldwork Experience!

By Duncan Campbell, MLML Ichthyology Lab

Total solar eclipses over tropical reefs are a rare and exciting occurrence - There will only be 54 more total eclipses this century, and more than half of those will occur near the poles, in the middle of the ocean, or over large landmasses. In Mexico, there will only be 2 more total eclipses this century. The effects of eclipses on land are well documented, but how do animals underwater respond? We knew that we were going to experience a 90% total eclipse during our trip to Isla El Pardito in Baja California Sur for MS 273: Marine Environmental Studies of the Gulf of California and had planned to be on shore watching it with eclipse glasses. However, once we got there a few of us had a more interesting idea. Why not go for a dive during the eclipse? I was diving constantly for my project, but I really didn’t have the time to slow down and explore during my dives. I was excited to observe how animals behaved during a unique celestial event. Plus, how many people can say they went for a dive during a nearly total solar eclipse? 

The Eclipse itself!

The idea of an eclipse dive had been bouncing around for a few days, but it mostly just a “wouldn’t it be fun” idea. The night before the eclipse, while we were planning the next day’s activities, I decided that I absolutely had to do it. It was a challenge to plan - we were going out on a boat that morning, and if we were delayed while returning, I might miss my chance. The eclipse peaked at 11:00 AM, and our boat would be getting back between 10:00 and 11:00. Since you always need buddies while you’re diving, I roped in one of my classmates, Jonah, and our TA, Roxy. We brought extra air tanks on our boat and decided that if we were running late, we would dive off the boat to get in the water on time. Fortunately, we timed our return perfectly and managed to get back, set up our gear on the beach, and walk into the water around 10:30. 

We had great conditions starting the dive - the water was calm, clear, and warm.  We swam south towards one of the deeper reefs surrounding El Pardito. Unlike most of our dives, where we were covered in transect tape reels, data slates, and other scientific equipment, this time we only had dive lights and underwater cameras.  We worked our way deeper into the reef, watching and recording as the reef slowly darkened. At 11:00, the eclipse reached its totality, the point where 90+% of the sun is blocked. The water had become noticeably darker than before, and it felt like we were diving at sunset. 

The light twenty feet underwater, around 11:00 AM during the totality.
Wrasses swimming closer to a coral head during the eclipse, while Roxy looks at something cool in the background.

On land, eclipses cause birds to stop singing and send most small animals into hiding. The air gets colder and the light vanishes without a clear cause, an event like no other.  However, without a change in temperature or other characteristics, an eclipse is just a change in the light underwater. Plenty of other things, like a storm overhead or dirt in the water, can change the amount of light underwater. It’s hard to tell how much fish respond to the eclipse vs other events as eclipses are a rare occurrence for a comprehensive analysis. To me, it seemed like the fish were more timid than usual, darting away and hiding from us. The schools of tiny wrasses that usually hovered over the corals hid closer to the rocks and inside the heads of corals. The larger fish swam away a little more quickly, and we saw less of the big predator species like snappers that usually patrol the reefs. It may not have been that unusual, but it felt like they noticed that something was different. We took photos and videos, but the dimness and change in environment doesn’t show well on camera.

The light thirty feet underwater at 11:30, after the eclipse.

It was an odd experience seeing how silent the reef felt, even with the constant burble of my scuba gear in the background. It was strangely still and slow, and even after the light started to come back, it was a little subdued. It’s hard to say if the animals really did react to the eclipse in a significant way, but it sure felt like they did. The fish around El Pardito aren’t particularly afraid of scuba divers, and usually swim right up to you. You can practically reach out and touch most fish. Pictures and videos can’t quite do justice to the experience of a sunset dive at noon.

Out of the Eclipse and Into New Environments:

As the eclipse ended, we swam deeper, through the reef towards a large sandy stretch below. We wanted to explore and see what might be down there. To our surprise, we found a rhodolith bed! Rhodoliths are calcareous red algae nodules that form on the bottom of the ocean in dense patches. This bed stretched as far as the eye could see and was full of little pebbly algae and shells. We explored the rhodolith bed for a few minutes before turning around - we had been down for about 25 minutes and only had about 50 minutes of air.  As the water brightened back up, we started to see more of the usual suspects on the reef. Brightly colored wrasses schooling above the reef, parrotfish plucking bits of algae off the rocks, leopard groupers cruising around looking for a snack. As we worked our way back across the seafloor towards the island, we started to notice little “piles” of pufferfish. Little groups of pufferfish sleeping on top of each other in full daylight. One of these groups had multiple pufferfish aggregated in an old metal basket underwater, with all the puffers clustered around a scorpionfish. We’re not sure, but we think they went to sleep during the eclipse and hadn’t really woken back up yet. It was a fascinating moment - pufferfish are fairly solitary creatures and we were shocked to see so many in one spot. 

A Scorpionfish sits next to an empty metal basket, while a pufferfish swims away in the background.
A pufferfish swims in front of the camera.

Final Thoughts:

Diving during the eclipse was a unique experience and one of the coolest dives I’ve ever been on. It was a great reminder to slow down every once in a while and enjoy the environment you’re working in, instead of just hammering on your work. We found a new rhodolith bed and saw some unusual fish behavior, none of which would have happened if we hadn’t decided to take time to explore and have fun. Our trip to El Pardito was an experience of a lifetime, and the kind of education you can never get in a classroom. I’ll remember my eclipse dive for the rest of my life. It really goes to show the value of a unique experience like MS 273, and how the best education comes from going outside and seeing the world. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rolling Along Together: What Rhodoliths Taught Me About Community

By Haylee Bregoff, MLML Invertebrate Ecology Lab

I had never heard of rhodoliths before our Baja Course (MS273 Marine Environmental Studies of the Gulf of California), but by the time we left El Pardito those little pink calcified wonders had left me absolutely awestruck; rhodolith beds truly are a special place. So what are rhodoliths? Rhodoliths are macroalgal ecosystem engineers that support high levels of marine biodiversity. These small calcified coralline algae are unattached (i.e., free-living) and non-geniculate (i.e., non-jointed, unlike some forms of branching coralline algae). Rhodoliths can cluster together to form beds, or individual nodules can fuse together to form larger conglomerates. Since rhodoliths have a complex branching thalli structure, they provide habitat to a diverse and unique array of associated species; they’re like small, calcified tumbleweeds rolling through soft, sandy bottoms and collecting organisms as they grow. On top of being an important biogenic habitat, rhodoliths provide ecosystem services like water filtration, maintenance of marine pH levels, climate regulation processes, and production of dissolved organic carbon and calcium carbonate.

For eleven days, we called the tiny island known as El Pardito home. Found in the Gulf of California and located about 90 km North of La Paz, the island was vibrant. Brightly painted palapas accented the clear teal water that filled the horizon. Even though we were as close to paradise as I’d ever experienced, it wasn't always easy. Days in the field were long and tiring as we woke up around 5-6 AM every day to check weather reports so we could plan our schedules accordingly. Most mornings I needed to take a second to adapt my plan and go with the flow, which is easier said than done when it comes to collecting data on a time crunch. We were living on island time; the ocean dictated our schedules so all we could rely on was each other. 

On the island, we quickly started to grow into a functional and supportive family. After spending three days trapped in cars, you would've thought that we had enough of each other, and if anything, resembled a dysfunctional family. But we were building a community, working together to achieve this unified goal of traveling and experiential learning. We woke up together, we ate breakfast together, we worked in the “lab” together, and together we were able to make these strong new connections to one another. Although at times we were fighting elements like high winds, heat, and swarms of bugs, Isla El Pardito was a refuge for us Moss Landing students; we supported one another despite our

cohort year, thesis research, or lab affiliation. Our ability to accomplish so much in such a short period of time taught me the importance of community building and collaboration.

The unifying structure of rhodoliths taught me more about community than I could have ever imagined. Although rhodolith morphology is diverse, with structures being uniquely characteristic and highly differentiated, they still roll on together. They create a habitat brimming with opportunity for life to settle and form communities in unexpected places. Beds with higher rhodolith species diversity and greater abundance are able to support more biodiverse and unique infaunal associations. Our class was like a beautiful rhodolith bed filled with unique individuals, each with our own strengths and interests. Each person with a beautifully distinct “structure” that complimented each other, allowing us to create some amazing memories together. The highlight of my Baja experience was being surrounded by passionate individuals that supported not only my growth as a researcher, but my growth as a person.

Back to Basic(-Need)s

By Kelsey Montalto, MLML Ichthyology Lab

As kids we all dream of going on a grand adventure. For all of us who too decided to sign up for “Marine Environmental Studies of the Gulf of California”, our grand adventure was setting out to another country with 11 people we had never traveled with for 16 days, knowing that for the majority of the time we’d be living out of small bags, not showering, and with sheets of nylon as our sturdiest barrier to the outside world while we slept.

Before we left, we all had some idea of how things would go on our trip, but I like to imagine that we all had our expectations subverted in the best way possible. Particularly, how in tune we all became with ourselves and the routines of others. It’s really interesting now to reflect on how easily we all left behind the more trivial portions of our modern-age lives, like technology.

Hiking up Isla San Fancisquito. From front to back: Haylee Bregoff, Kierstin Thigpen, Logan Early, Noah Kolander, Kelsey Montalto, Duncan Campbell, Jonah Gier, Jess Franks, and Diana Steller.

In preparation for the trip, we were advised to really be present along our journey as we drove from Moss Landing all the way to El Portugues just north of La Paz, while on the little island of El Pardito, and again on the way back up. And I don’t think any of us took it for granted. Emails, social media, and the like – which are usually integral to our lives – were all distant thoughts as we drove along watching the incredible desert landscape change along the way. Even on the island only roughly the size of two football fields in size, we wanted for not. It was truly a case of back to basics in its truest sense: eat, sleep, “go to the bathroom”, get in the water, rinse and repeat.

And you might be saying to yourself, “Well of course, this isn’t groundbreaking”. The way I see it, there are a few key reasons why we went back to basics, or rather, back to basic needs:

  1. We had limited power and internet, so tech use was difficult to accomplish
  2. We were physically too far away from our typical schedules/responsibilities back home to worry about them
  3. There was only so much we could bring with us and little chance of resupply
  4. Frankly, by the time we finished each day, all we could do was stay in tune with what our bodies needed
Twice daily tradition of brushing of teeth under the palapa together (morning here). From left to right: Kelsey Montalto and Jess Franks.

Each of us had our own method to our madness, whether that be our preferred camping style (tent, hammock, out in the open), “bathroom preference” (bucket or ocean), and even sleep schedules. And how did we entertain ourselves? Through conversation, exploration, jokes, games, and quite a bit of acapella. We even turned putting on lotion into a group activity and brushing our teeth into a game by seeing how far each of us could spit after we finished.

Even as our trip was ending, I think we all realized how special our grand adventure actually had been, and it was exactly that, grand. Now that we’re back, we’ve had to fall back into the hustle and bustle of our busy lives being torn in a million different directions with all the distractions in the world at our fingertips. Even so, we will always know what it was like to feel as if we were living in a scene of a movie at the top of a mountain, wake up earlier than we ever thought we voluntarily would (before even the alarm), have the most people aware of your bodily functions since toddlerhood, push the dinner tables together to eat “family dinner style”, and know what it means to truly get back to our basic needs.

 

Nature’s tiny heroes: how bacteria can devour plastic pollution in our oceans

By Hannah McGrath, MLML Biological Oceanography Lab

Plastic pollution continues to be a growing issue on our planet, especially for our oceans. The global pandemic only contributed to our growing plastic problem. During the height of the pandemic, I remember walking along Riverside Park in New York City to escape my tiny apartment; the sidewalks and shorelines were littered with KN95 masks and light blue latex gloves. As I continued my walks throughout the pandemic, the sight of personal protective equipment scattered across the city became the norm. According to lead researcher Dr. Patrício Silva at the University of Aveiro, the pandemic dramatically increased the amount of plastic medical waste that has entered our aquatic systems. These plastics can then degrade into microplastics (< 5 mm in size) through physical, chemical, and biological processes which can have adverse effects on ecological and human health.

Although microplastics are small in size, they have a disproportionate effect on the environment. For instance, zooplankton which are important players in our ocean food webs and the biological carbon pump, a process that exports carbon to the deep sea, are threatened by microplastics. Zooplankton are able to consume microplastics which can damage their intestinal tracts, alter gene expression, delay growth, and impact feeding behavior resulting in decreased reproductive abilities according to lead scientist Dr. Meiting He at the College of Marine Sciences, South China Agricultural University. Unsurprisingly, microplastics have been identified in the gut content of organisms’ at almost all trophic levels from zooplankton to humans. Microplastics are in the clothing we wear, seafood we consume, beauty products we use, and more. In fact, in a 2019 study lead author Kieran Cox, a PhD candidate at the University of Victoria, estimated that ~39,000-52,000 pieces of microplastic are ingested by humans annually!

Illustration of microplastics (MPs) entering aquatic systems and being consumed by zooplankton resulting in the trophic-transfer of MPs up the food chain (He et al 2022). 

Not only is plastic pollution increasing but so is our need to adopt effective and sustainable ways for disposing plastics at a large scale. Current methods for plastic disposal are mismanaged and unsustainable. One common way to dispose of plastic is by incineration. However, during incineration plastics release carcinogens, dioxins, furans, heavy metals and sulfides into the environment states researchers Dr. Aubrey Chigwada and Dr. Memory Tekere at the University of South Africa. Another common method is dumping plastic waste into landfills but this causes plastic overflow affecting the biodiversity of the region. In addition, landfills store not only plastic waste but all types of waste that can decompose. During decomposition processes the potent greenhouse gas, methane, is released into the atmosphere which contributes to climate change. These landfills can also leak which can contaminate nearby groundwaters. Although recycling may seem like a promising way to dispose of plastics, at large scales it is too expensive and not feasible.

A more sustainable method to dispose of plastic is using microorganisms like bacteria that can biodegrade plastics. The first study that investigated microplastic degradation by microorganisms was Dr. Cacciari and his colleagues from the University of Tuscia in 1993. The researchers used the bacteria Pseudomonas and Vibrio to degrade polypropylene. Since 1993, many researchers have studied biodegradation of various plastics using bacteria from around the globe. Bacteria naturally exist in various environments from cow dung to human eyelashes to hot springs to polar ice caps making them suitable candidates for degrading microplastics. For instance, lead author Jun Yang at Beihang University, Beijing found two bacterial strains isolated from the gut of Indian mealmoths that were able to consume the plastic polyethylene.

Image of the two bacterial strains, Enterobacter asburiae and Bacillus sp. isolated from the gut of Indian meal moths (Yang et al. 2014).

Not only can bacteria naturally degrade plastics, but they can also be geoengineered to remove plastic from our oceans. Bacteria may just be nature's tiny heroes to combat plastic pollution. Currently, Professor Song Lin Chua and his colleagues at the Hong Kong Polytechnic University (PolyU) have bioengineered the bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa to remove microplastics from the environment. The researchers plan to use the sticky nature of bacteria to create “tape-like microbe nets” to capture microplastics. These microbial nets filled with microplastics then sink to the bottom of the water column. The bacteria’s biofilm dispersal gene is then engineered to release these microplastics from the biofilm traps. The bulk microplastics then float to the surface and are recycled. These preliminary experiments have been successful but have not been conducted outside of a controlled setting.

 

Schematic illustration of the bioengineered bacteria, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, removing microplastics from the water column using the 'capture-and-release' method developed by researchers at Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Although scientists are developing innovative ways to remove plastics from our ocean, there have been concerns about using bacteria to do this. Engineering bacteria to break down plastics especially in hot spots like the Pacific Garbage patch may reduce plastic waste, but may also have unintended consequences. For instance, breaking down microplastics may increase microplastic ingestion by other marine organisms like zooplankton that are known to consume microplastics. Another drawback is that the bacteria aeruginosa, that was used in PolyU preliminary experiments, carries diseases for humans’ states Professor Chua. Researchers are still searching for a bacterium that could be engineered that is natural and safe to humans at a large scale. But I am hopeful that scientists will find a safe and suitable candidate since bacteria are extremely abundant in the ocean. For every 1 ml of seawater there are ~1 million bacteria!

The reality is plastic pollution in the ocean is rapidly increasing. It is imperative that we find a solution to our growing plastic pollution problem sooner than later. Bacteria may just be one solution to our global plastic problem. However, more research and experimentation are still needed to understand the true benefits and consequences of genetically engineering bacteria to remove plastic from our oceans. Will bacteria be able to solve our plastic pollution problem?

 

References

Cacciari, I., Quatrini, P., Zirletta, G., Mincione, E., Vinciguerra, V., Lupattelli, P., Giovannozzi Sermanni, G., 1993. Isotactic polypropylene biodegradation by a microbial community: physicochemical characterization of metabolites produced. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59, 3695–3700. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.59.11.3695-3700.1993

Chigwada, A.D., Tekere, M., 2023. The plastic and microplastic waste menace and bacterial biodegradation for sustainable environmental clean-up a review. Environ. Res. 231, 116110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.116110

Cox, K.D., Covernton, G.A., Davies, H.L., Dower, J.F., Juanes, F., Dudas, S.E., 2020. Correction to human consumption of microplastics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 10974–10974. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c04032

He, M., Yan, M., Chen, X., Wang, X., Gong, H., Wang, W., Wang, J., 2022. Bioavailability and toxicity of microplastics to zooplankton. Gondwana Res. 108, 120–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2021.07.021

Liu, S.Y., Leung, M.M.-L., Fang, J.K.-H., Chua, S.L., 2021. Engineering a microbial ‘trap and release’ mechanism for microplastics removal. Chem. Eng. J. 404, 127079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.127079

Patrício Silva, A.L., Prata, J.C., Walker, T.R., Duarte, A.C., Ouyang, W., Barcelò, D., Rocha-Santos, T., 2021. Increased plastic pollution due to COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges and recommendations. Chem. Eng. J. 405, 126683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.126683

Yang, J., Yang, Y., Wu, W.-M., Zhao, J., Jiang, L., 2014. Evidence of polyethylene biodegradation by bacterial strains from the guts of plastic-eating waxworms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 13776–13784. https://doi.org/10.1021/es504038a

 

 

How long is that tail?

By Jessica Jang

On Labor Day weekend, Moss Landing Marine Laboratories' own Pacific Shark Research Center (PSRC) had the opportunity to dissect a 14.7 feet long common thresher shark (Alopias vulpinus). The female shark was found washed up on the beach on Moss Landing already dead.

Program Director, Dave Ebert, PSRC students, and UROC students posing with the thresher shark
Program Director Dave Ebert, PSRC students, and Undergraduate Research Opportunities Center (UROC) students posing with the thresher shark

The PSRC is part of the National Shark Research Consortium for the West Coast. Currently there are 7 students enrolled in this department led by the program director, Dr. David Ebert, also a MLML alumni, and a handful of undergraduate volunteers from San Jose State University and California State University: Monterey Bay all who are ready to learn more about elasmobranchs!

The students were pretty amazed to see such small teeth on such a large shark. Thresher shark head The teeth on this animal say a lot about what it eats. Schooling fish such as sardines and anchovies, as well as cephalopods are its preferred prey. Thresher sharks are part of the mackerel shark order (Lamniformes) and excel at speed and long distances. A few examples of this order include, the white shark (Carcharodon carcharias), the makos, shorfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus), longfin mako (Isurus paucus), the salmon shark (Lamna ditropis), and the porbeagle shark (Lamna nasus). These species in particular are endothermic, meaning that they can thermoregulate their own body temperature to several degrees warmer than the ocean water, allowing better foraging opportunities.

Large gills for breathing
Large gills for breathing

They also have big eyes to find prey and large gill slits for oxygen. Since these species are pelagic species, they require a lot of oxygen to keep moving. Lamniformes (mackeral sharks) breathe through ram ventilation, where the animal swims while opening its mouth. These species require constant motion or else they'll drown. However, some sharks have adapted to living life on the bottom, and can actively pump water pass their gills with their spiracles, which are tiny holes usually located behind the eyes on the shark. In larger oceanic species, the spiracles have lost its ability to pump water.

The dissection was a very exciting and rare opportunity, since thresher sharks are pelagic predatory fish, that spend their lives in the open ocean. There are currently only three known species of thresher sharks, the common (Alopias vulpinus), pelagic (Alopias pelagicus), and the big-eye thresher (Alopias superciliosus).

Previously it was thought that thresher sharks used to swing their tails around to catch their prey. However, a new study this summer show that they actually use their long caudal tails to stun their prey. Scientists managed to catch footage of the pelagic thresher shark (Alopias pelagicus) in action.

Students were able to take morphometric data of the shark by measuring everything from body length and fin lengths, counting the vertebrae, and noting of any visible scars or injuries.

Dave Ebert instructing PSRC students how to measure
Dave Ebert instructing PSRC students how to measure the shark

One noticeable wound was the large propeller strike that was near the end of her body.

Wound found on the shark, possibly from a propeller.
Wound found on the shark, possibly from a propeller.

They also took tissue samples of the shark's muscles, reproductive organs, and liver to detect mercury levels. Since sharks are apex predators, meaning they eat at top of the food chain, toxins and heavy metals can bioaccumulate which can cause detrimental health problems if they are in high concentrations. Stay tuned to see if we found something revealing on what may have caused her death.

Let the learning commence

By Jackie Schwartzstein, Vertebrate Ecology Lab

When did you first become interested in science? Do you remember the first time you got excited about learning something new? In the wake of my first year of graduate school, I am practicing a little metacognition.

In the past few months I've been hearing and reading some interesting ideas about how we learn:

1. A TED talk about how to get out of the way and let students learn, unsupervised.  (Click the link and watch it!)

20130617-124335.jpg
Still from Mitra's TED talk

If you are reading this blog, you are already participating in a self-teaching, Internet-based learning opportunity. Sugata Mitra's talk proposes a system of teaching in communities where Internet cafes are not the norm, and undereducated youth lack the teachers they need. With his hole in the wall computer Mitra watched groups of students learn complicated scientific concepts in foreign languages, with no regular instructor or grade based incentive.  In concert with the new idea for world wide Internet distributed through weather balloons (see this site), could Mitra's inspiring concept be our future?

2. A research study popularized by my Facebook wall, about how cute baby animal pictures help you think. (Click the link to read for yourself!)

If these authors are right, you will be much more productive with your office work after reading this article. Pictures of baby animals helped study participants perform both fine motor and visual search tasks, "interpreted as the result of a narrowed attentional focus induced by the cuteness-triggered positive emotion that is associated with approach motivation and the tendency toward systematic processing".  Baby animal pictures improved task performance more than either adult animal pictures or photos of tasty food.  Remember to glance at this page again before you shut your computer in the evening and drive home - it will make you a better driver!

3. An article about how Americans are learning outside of the classroom.  (Click the link to read!)

Screen shot 2013-06-23 at 8.19.59 AM
A learning opportunity outside of the classroom. Photo from the above article.

This article suggests a theory to explain why American students perform poorly in math and the sciences (during K-12), compared to the rest of the world.  It turns out that we might be learning more after we get out of school, bridging the gap later in life.  The authors suggest that we can continue to bridge gaps in our public science education by improving science learning outside of the classroom, during "the other 95%" of our lives.  The US has a good basis for this type of public education, with more natural history museums, aquariums, libraries, and science centers than most other developed countries.

"Insufficient data exist to conclusively demonstrate that free-choice science learning experiences currently contribute more to public understanding of science than in-school experiences, but a growing body of evidence points in this direction."

All in all, this seems to support what we are doing already at MLML. Students of marine science do a lot of their learning outside of school. Just look at our blog posts! Hands on field courses are what get us really excited here at MLML!  And we even get the chance to look at cute baby animals from time to time.

BabyPufferFish
Baby Puffer Fish. Photo from http://www.thecutereport.com/index.php/2007/09/06/baby-puffer-fish/

Hope your summer is full of exciting things to learn!

A Point Sur Adventure

Marine Ecology students on the Point Sur cruise sort and record organisms from the Monterey Bay.

By Kristin Walovich

The Marine Ecology class embarked on a seafaring adventure last Monday on the Moss Landing research vessel the Point Sur to observe the biota of the Monterey Bay. The class was joined by members from the Monterey Bay Aquarium, MBARI and even Professor Emeritus Greg Cailliet who arrived bright and early for a 7am departure time.

After braving choppy water and a bit of rain we began our day with a beam trawl, designed to sample creatures from the ocean floor at 600 meters depth. Unfortunately we were left empty handed when the net returned to the surface with a hole caused from large rocks lodged in the net.

Despite our first strikeout, our second mid-water trawl yielded a wide array of fish, crustaceans, jellyfish, and a plethora of other gelatinous creatures. Once on board the Point Sur, each animal was classified into separate glass dishes and recorded, giving the students a chance to practice their species identification and exercise their Latin nomenclature.

The highlight of the trawl (quite literally) was a group of fish called the Myctophids, or Lanternfish. These fish have light emitting cells called photophores that help camouflage them in the deep ocean waters in which they live. Lanternfish regulate the photophores on their flanks and underside to match the ambient light levels from the surface, rendering them nearly invisible from predators below.

Image
Lanternfish emit light from cells called photophores that help camouflage them from predators.

The last tow of the day was called an otter trawl; but don’t worry, we didn’t catch any sea otters.  This net is name for the ‘otter’ boards positioned at the mouth of the net designed to keep it open as it travels thought the water. The animals are funneled to the back or ‘cod’ end of the net and are brought to the surface for the class to observe.  We saw several species of flatfish including the Sand Dab, Dover and English Sole, several dozen octopuses (or octopodes depending on your dictionary) and even a pacific electric ray.

After a long day of sunshine, high seas and amazing sea creatures the Marine Ecology students were excited with their discoveries, but also ready to be back on solid ground.

Image

6 am: Not Just For Sleeping Anymore

By Alex Neu, CSUMB/UROC research assistant

Sunrise at Sunset Cliffs
Sunrise at Sunset Cliffs, San Diego

Like most kids growing up, I envisioned a scientist as someone sitting behind a microscope or  pouring colorful liquids into a flask to make some kind of potion. During my internship I have seen a variety of work researchers do every day and that stereotype certainly does not do them justice. An average day might include sitting behind a computer doing a literature review, taking water samples in the lab, extracting enzymes from specimens and going to a meeting based entirely on statistical analyses. These tasks have all been incredible learning experiences, but recently I got a taste of my new favorite activity in research: going into the field.

Seagull and coffee mug
We weren't the only ones in need of a pick-me-up for a 6 am collection

Our first day of collecting crustose coralline algae (CCA) began promptly at 6 am at Sunset Cliffs in San Diego. Since CCA are common in the intertidal pools at Sunset Cliffs, we had to be sure to collect on a lower low tide, and it just so happens that this week those low tides were much earlier than would have been preferred. Caffeinated beverages in hand, our small team trekked to the shore and discussed distinctive features of the species we were looking for. Many species of CCA look similar and multiple species can inhabit the same small cobble. We split up and waded through the low tide, searching beds of sea grass and small rock crevices for any stones with a distinctive layer of calcified red algae. After about an hour we had found enough samples to run our experiment and we headed back to the lab to take a closer look at the CCA.

The following day found us out in the brisk morning air of Sunset Cliffs once again, this time searching for an articulated species of coralline algae .We found ourselves once again searching the warm water of the seagrass beds to collect healthy samples with a delicate touch. As the sun rose over the cliffs we started on our way back to the lab with the treasures of the day to begin our experiment. Being a part of an experiment from the very beginning and knowing exactly where each of your samples comes from makes a project just a little more special and is something you can be a little more proud of when it’s run its course.

Dozens of Diatoms

By Catherine Drake, Invertebrate Zoology Lab

The last field trip of the fall semester for the Geological Oceanography class was to the Monterey Formation on Toro Road in the Salinas Basin. As we drove up through the hills on the winding road, we came across a grayish cliff that must have spanned about a mile down the road. The students got out of the car, and as we walked along the road, we noted the striations and laminations within the sedimentary layers. What’s especially interesting about these layers is that they are biogenic sediments: they consist of organic particles, usually in the form of skeletal fragments of marine organisms.

The Monterey Formation consists of an incalculable amount of diatoms, which are a type of phytoplankton and are primary producers, meaning they take up carbon dioxide while. Diatoms have siliceous tests, meaning that their cell walls are silica based; so, when diatoms die, they become part of a siliceous ooze and get deposited on the seafloor. Considering that diatoms usually range from 2 to 200 μm and the Monterey Formation spanned almost a mile, which means that there were hundreds of millions of diatoms at the time! Primary production must have been incredibly high during that time period, which was approximately between 11 and 3 million years ago.

Diatoms are phytoplankton that produce oxygen through primary production.

Invertebrate Spotlight: Christmas Tree Worms

By Catherine Drake, Invertebrate Zoology Lab

For those of you vertebrates who still have their holiday decorations up, here is an invertebrate you might enjoy learning about: the Christmas tree worm.  These polychaetes, Spirobranchus giganteus, are tube-building worms that have two “crowns” in the shape of Christmas trees, hence their name.

Many Christmas tree worms assembled together.

These appendages are an extension of their mouth and catch prey that swims by and then transport it by cilia to the worm’s mouth.  Additionally, the appendages act as part of the worm’s respiratory system, and are thus commonly referred to as gills.  Christmas tree worms are generally found in tropical waters and live within corals in calcareous tubes formed by the worms.

The appendages on these polycheates aid in the catching of prey.